Maddie - “I did not pursue nobody”, says Gonçalo Amaral
"Gonçalo Amaral, former-inspector of the Judiciary Policy, launched to the end of the afternoon of this thursday, the book on the inquiry to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. In the presentation of the publication “Maddie: The Truth of the Lie”, the man who led the process during six months guaranteed that “never it pursued nobody”, when questioned for the journalists on if this work would not be a form of persecution or revenge.
“I did not pursue nobody”, moreover, “the commitment of any investigator is the discovery of the truth”, said. It always added despite “it made the possible work, with good intention”.
In the press conference that elapsed before the official presentation of the book, Gonçalo Amaral answered the questions of the journalists and to the PortugalDiário it explained what it would have made of different form if it could come back: “With mine it equips did not leave that the inquiry had suffered with as much politicalization and pressures”.
The formerones advanced despite it would have made “more early” some you endeavour with the McCann and the friends, nominated, assuming “the suspicion” who fell again on them. Even because it had, in its opinion, too much well-taken care of and attention in the treatment given to the couple.
“Another result with another MP”
The former-policy related despite the indications collected during the inquiry “could have another valuation” with “another Public prosecution service”. E remembers that the official notice of the PGR only relates “to lack of tests” and not “lack of indications”. For the former-inspector a it proves is, in the deep one, “a set of indications”. “An indication is an indication. Two are two, three already are a test”.
Gonçalo Amaral goes more far and uses its long experience to affirm that it knows many people “to the wait of trial” against who “does not have any indication”, but only “inferições”.
“I do not make futurologia”
Questioned on if the inquiry it could have had another outcome I obtain to lead believes it that yes. “I do not make futurologia, perhaps but we had IDO more far”. Because it even remembers that “he was not the only one to abandon the inquiry. It also had an English policy that also it was retired”.
It is with some faith that Gonçalo Amaral believes the possibility of the case to be reopened, also recognizing that it did not write in the book “everything what it knows”."
fonte: http://diario.iol.pt/sociedade/livro-goncalo-amaral-pj-maddie/975095-4071.html
Maddie: it almost said where it was the body
"The formerones of the Judiciary Policy, Gonçalo Amaral, responsible during six months for the inquiry to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, and later moved away from the case, assumes power to be “naive” but it believes, as other investigators that had worked I obtain, that Kate “would be in the disposal of, without if compromising, to indicate the place where the body of the son was, and that the same it would be placed in the zone of the Village of the Light”.
From a certain height, the mother of Maddie, started to transmit to the judiciary information that received from psychic and people with being able paranormais, on where could be the body of the child. One month later “it already placed the hypothesis” of the son not to be alive, although to affirm the opposite public.
The revelation is made in the book, “Maddie the truth of the lie”, that the formerones of the PJ, presents this thursday, in Lisbon, and where it tells, in 200 pages and 23 chapters, diverse steps of the inquiry and its version of the events. Between the many disclosed data, we find the main reasons that had always taken Gonçalo Amaral to distrust of Gerry and Kate and of the group of friends who with them passed vacation. It admits exactly that the couple was dealt “with clamps” and “privileges”.
Depositions do not coincide
The depositions given for the group relative at night of the facts, and in which they were it supper together, are not coincident. It has discrepancies in the hours, the sequências and the told details. They had been same you deliver to judiciary the two lists written by hand for the group, on the hours the one that the different members of the group had been to control the children. The two documents that are not equal and “an attempt is noticed” to fill secular emptinesses.
Kate gave the alarm for return of 22h and guarantees that the window of the room of the son was “all opening” and the raised blinds. Gonçalo Amaral questions, for example, that the friend of the couple ¿ Jane - it can have seen a man to load a child in the arms for return of 21h20/21h25. When little time later, and before being given lack of the minor (21h30), another member of the group, Matthew, goes to the apartments and not note that the window of the room is opened. For the sequência of the events, the alleged abductor already would have entered in the house and taken the girl in this height.
In the following day to the fatídico event, he has a reaction of Kate that leaves Gonçalo frightened Amaral. Somebody affirms to have seen a girl similar to Maddie in a service station and has video images. Kate that already had been heard in the PJ is obliged to return: “A little enfadada by having Reveals been obliged to return and bothered with the speed reached for the car of it polices where if it dislocated. We found odd that one did not reveal hopeful with the possibility of the girl to be recouped”.
Registers of extinguished calls
In the following morning to the disappearance, the PJ asks for to the parents to consult its telemóveis. E discovers that it enters 27 of April and 4 of May, Kate did not make no call. Nor it received no phone call enters 11h22 of day 2 of May and 23h17 of the night of the facts.
Already Gerry did not have no previous register to day 4 of May. However, the agents repair that in telemóvel of Kate the reception of a call made for its husband to 23h17 of day 3 of May is indicated. But in the one of it nothing does not consist. The PJ concluded that the registers of the calls were “extinguished of the telephones”. Reason?"
